Legal Developments

Retaliation

Recent California employment-law developments in Retaliation.

Discrimination

Court Rejects Cap on “Garden-Variety” Emotional Distress Damages

The Second District held that a trial court abused its discretion by capping “garden-variety” emotional distress damages and rejecting a plaintiff’s own testimony about future economic loss⁠—⁠reinstating a multimillion-dollar jury verdict.

Retaliation

Government Claim Forms Must State a Date for Ongoing Retaliation

The First District held that a government claim form alleging ongoing retaliation must state a date or date range for the wrongful conduct⁠—⁠and that listing the date of loss as “numerous” and “ongoing” neither complies nor substantially complies with the Government Claims Act.

Retaliation

Ninth Circuit Vacates Injunction Against Federal Bargaining Order

The Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction against Executive Order 14,251, holding that on this record the government showed the President would have excluded the agencies from federal collective bargaining even without any retaliatory motive.

Arbitration

Arbitration Award May Offset Discipline the SPB Upheld

The Third District held that an arbitrator’s award offsetting a suspension the State Personnel Board had upheld did not violate public policy⁠—⁠and ordered the award confirmed in full.

Labor Relations

California Enacts the Workplace Know Your Rights Act

Senate Bill 294 requires California employers to give employees an annual written notice of workplace and constitutional rights, offer an emergency-contact option, and notify that contact if an employee is arrested or detained at work.